Posts Tagged ‘9/11’

Statement Of September 11th Advocates Regarding Reaction To AG Eric Holder?s Announcement On Moving 9/11 Trials To NYC. my comment. Now to the sheik. He has something against him that should bring him at least life in prison. And that is badly mistreating and factual killing / ‘his hands’/ of American hostage journalist Daniel Pearl in Pakistan. As to his 9/11 testimony, under the duress of quasi torture, that has almost no real value. He might have wished 9/11 attacks to happen, and might have helped organize them, even though the directly responsible are dead with the airplanes. All Arabs involved in the 9/11 inside operation attacks probably never knew, and do not know now, that they were aided, allowed, and helped by inside forces. … Without that, no 9/11pretext for war inside job controlled demolition would have happened. Many Arabs, former friends of USA, started to hate US after bombing apart and occupation of Iraq 91-03. That is not a crime, however, 1.. they cannot plan and carry out terrorist

November 19, 2009 in 9/11
Tags: ,

http://kl.am/4YU2

9/11 Truth and the Paranoid Style. ~official propaganda, babble at Boingboing. my 9/11 controlled demolition comments. Your arguments are very easy to completely refute, they are all just suppositions, no hard facts. Also, my original post here was censored, but I’l try the best. 9/11 is a controlled demolition, per irrefutable scientific evidence, and per common sense. It is not possible that 2 towers fall down, in 13 seconds, that 110 floors per second pulverize, implode, with a speed close to free fall. Not possible that steel melts. UNLESS it is a controlled demolition. Indeed, high military explosive was found on the site. http://911UnitedWeInvestigate.blogspot.com ===== Your points 1. yes, it is a flawlessly carried out masterpiece controlled demolition. There was, for months, unobstructed access to the buildings. We need new investigation to find who and how they did it. People who were bringing boxes up, and applying the nanothermite explosive, probably did not know what they are doing. 2. There w

November 16, 2009 in 9/11, 9/11 controlled demolition
Tags: ,

http://kl.am/4UqG

9/11 Truth: Connecting the Dots | DarkGovernment http://bit.ly/14TZxJ

November 16, 2009 in 9/11, 9/11 controlled demolition, News
Tags: , ,

http://kl.am/4Ubk

9/11 is a controlled demolition. Per irrefutable scientific evidence. You can have your opinion and your mind a.. http://bit.ly/22aYwu

November 16, 2009 in 9/11, 9/11 controlled demolition, News
Tags: , ,

http://kl.am/4Ubi

Facts not Fairies. What is the truth? Who is behind 9/11 controlled demolition attacks? We need a new investiga.. http://bit.ly/1Aw0Ha

November 16, 2009 in 9/11, 9/11 controlled demolition, News
Tags: , ,

http://kl.am/4Ubh

Truth Seeking: 9/11 Revisited: A Thumbnail Sketch. I am a truth seeker, just a curious man trying to make sense of a crazy world

November 16, 2009 in 9/11, 9/11 controlled demolition, News
Tags: , ,

http://kl.am/4TVI

What hit Pentagon? A missile? 9/11 controlled demolition inside job. Either a missile, or a smaller remotely controlled plane.

November 16, 2009 in 9/11, 9/11 controlled demolition, News
Tags: , ,

http://kl.am/4TVF

9/11 is a controlled demolition. Per irrefutable scientific evidence. You can have your opinion and your mind and your views, but there is one truth, and that is that 9/11 attacks, a central issue of 9/11 Truth, were done by a controlled demolition of 3 towers. True, then there is ramming an aerial vehicle into Pentagon, and shooting down an airplane in Pennsylvania. All else “9/11..” as you mention are secondary preceding or following events. But the MAIN 9/11 Truth issue is 9/11 attacks, and that was controlled demolition. I could as well almost ask you, 1. Do you know, or believe, that nanothermite was found on the site? That steel melted? 2. If so, what do you think that means? And we should EXACTLY concentrate on the strongest scientific point, and that is CONTROLLED DEMOLITION. The issues is very hard, serious and overwhelming. It almost includes psychotherapy, of each citizen, of the whole nation. WHO ELSE but US should be speaking the truth? And, I am not here to make friends, Im here to s

November 16, 2009 in 9/11, 9/11 controlled demolition, News
Tags: , ,

http://kl.am/4TQL

Bin Laden Responsible for the 9/11 Attacks? Where is the Evidence? David Ray Griffin Infowars 10- 2, 2009, 911Blogger.com. My comment: I think pondering this question we really need to ask, WHAT do we mean, “responsible” or “guilty”, for, what we now know, are controlled demolition attacks. 1. Bin Ladin was not in any airplaines hijacked that day. 2. Bin Ladin was not training in pilot schools and was not on the soil of the USA. Was he “planning” or “financing” or “otherwise helping” the attacks? Maybe. But how much that would take? Get guys willing to do it, get them money to live for couple years and to attend pilot schools in US, get them box-cutters. I think the real guilty ones are hijackers in airplanes. Was he wishing for attacks to happen? Probably, just as others did, as Iraq was bombed apart, occupied, humiliated, and US seen as unilateral supporter of Palestine. It as a public knowledge /US TV/, that Muslims “would like to ram airplanes in New York buildings” But without US “let 9/11 happen”

November 2, 2009 in 9/11, 9/11 controlled demolition, News
Tags: , ,

http://kl.am/4Aiu

Dep of State Does Not Respond To FOIA Requests. Pilots for 9/11 Truth concluded that the FDR data released by the NTSB has the plane flying too high to hit the Pentagon .. NTSB does not have either serial or part numbers for the FDRs from American Airlines Flight # 77 or United Airlines Flight # 93 (which allegedly crashed in Shanksville, PA). This is highly unusual

September 6, 2009 in News
Tags:

http://ping.fm/S6J9P